Mental Health Reentry Programs For Parolees
- Reentry Support (16 Products. Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program, Feb 11, 2011 (Slides) SMA11-PHYDE021111. A Toolkit for Developing HIV Peer Programs - Boston University School of Public Health.
- Reentry Planning (Jail Discharge Planning): These programs and staff are bridging legal and human services systems to connect individuals experiencing incarceration to behavioral health treatment and supportive services.
- The Mental Health Services Continuum Program (MHSCP) was implemented in California state prisons and consisted of multiple components designed to increase continuity of mental health care during reentry.
Mental Health Reentry Programs For Felons
Details for ReEntry Mental Health Services - Addiction Services at 40 South Church Street in Westminster, Maryland. Treatment details, care types, payment methods, and more. Home » Mental Health Reentry Program. Mental Health Reentry Program.
Mental Health Services Continuum Program — What Works in Reentry Clearinghouse. Focus Areas: Mental and Physical Health. Interventions: Transitional Health Treatment and Services. Evaluations & Outcomes. Program Description.
The Mental Health Services Continuum Program (MHSCP) was implemented in California state prisons and consisted of multiple components designed to increase continuity of mental health care during reentry into the community from prison. MHSCP consisted of two main elements. The first was the Transitional Case Management Program, in which social workers conducted face- to- face assessments of eligible inmates. The social worker who performed the assessment then sent the assessment information to the client. The second component consisted of post- release attendance at the Parole Outpatient Clinic, which was open to all parolees with a mental health diagnosis, but to which MHSCP participants were specifically referred through the pre- release mental health needs assessment.
Recommendations for Practice. While the researchers did not conduct a process evaluation, several challenges to implementation were noted in interviews with clinicians and as a part of the outcome evaluation. When interviewed, clinicians noted that a poorly functioning patient computer database impaired successful transfer of information between the secure facility and Parole Outpatient Clinics.
In addition, the interviews also suggested a need for improved communication and coordination between clinicians at the secure facility and those at Parole Outpatient Clinics to increase the likelihood of program participants receiving services while on parole. Thus, the study suggested that strategies of increasing and facilitating communication between mental health staff inside and outside the secure institution, including an efficient computer database, would be beneficial to other jurisdictions interested in implementing similar programs.
The researchers also noted that not all individuals who were identified as eligible for the program received a pre- release mental health needs assessment, suggesting that social workers encountered time constraints hampering their ability to reach prospective program participants. Other jurisdictions may seek to provide adequate time and staff resources to process the full share of eligible individuals. Suggestions for Future Research. Given that little can be determined from a single study, additional research–and particularly studies that more directly evaluate the impact of pre- release assessment on recidivism–would be helpful in determining whether MHSCP or similar programs significantly impact participant outcomes.